Tag: Publishing Biz (71-80 of 90)

Oct 19 2009 11:07 AM ET

Who's the most romantic character in literature?

So, in a recent British poll on the most romantic literary character of all time (men, that is; they dealt with women in an earlier poll), top honors went to Rochester, the brooding hunk at the heart of Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre. Though I’m a huge fan of Jane Eyre — I reread my well-thumbed copy at least once a year — I’m not enamored of Rochester, who, let’s face it, wasn’t very nice to poor Jane. (For those who you who haven’t read the book, or who read it so long ago it’s a distant blur, let’s just say Rochester was alternately cold, imperious, and withholding, and he proposed to Jane —  and was going through with the wedding — without  disclosing that he was already married to a madwoman he kept imprisoned in the attic). But am I possibility in the minority here? British best-selling novelist Penny Vincenzi wrote in the Daily Telegraph: “From that very first meeting [age 13, when she read the book for the first time], when Rochester’s horse slipped on the ice, and he was unseated, and I was confronted by his dark, unsmiling presence, his ‘stern features, and heavy brow… his considerable breadth of chest,’ I was completely in his thrall.”

So here’s the British poll in full:

1. Edward Rochester of Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre
2. Richard Sharpe of Bernard Cornwell’s Sharpe series.
3. Fitzwilliam Darcy of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice
4. Heathcliff of Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights
5. Rhett Butler of Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With the Wind
6. Mark Darcy, of Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones’ Diary
7. Captain Corelli of Louis de Berniere’s Captain Corelli’s Mandolin
8. Henry DeTamble of Audrey Niffenegger’s The Time Traveler’s Wife
9. Gabriel Oak of Thomas Hardy’s Far From the Madding Crowd
10. Rupert Campbell Black of Jilly Cooper’s The Rutshire Chronicles

Several thoughts here. Maybe it’s because I’m a Southern, but Rhett Butler — the dashing Charleston-born blockade runner who lusted after Scarlett O’Hara — is tops with me. READ FULL STORY »

Oct 16 2009 12:46 PM ET

Walmart and Amazon get into price war: $9 hardcovers

Your high school English teacher may have told you that the value of a good book was immeasurable, but Walmart and Amazon have a feeling that it hovers somewhere under 10 bucks. The two online giants have begun a deep-discount war that is more reminiscent of neighboring delis with erasable sandwich boards than retail behemoths.

Walmart fired the opening salvo on Thursday with a promotion offering their top 10 pre-ordered books (including Sarah Palin’s memoir and new books from Stephen King, James Patterson, John Grisham, and Michael Crichton) for only a sawbuck — including free shipping. Amazon responded to the broadside by matching their price, but as of this morning, both deals had slipped down another notch to a staggering $9 per popular new hardcover. That’s over two-thirds off the cover price of Palin’s Going Rogue, which, according to the Wall Street Journal, retailers are hoping will provide a shot in the arm for somewhat sluggish book sales this fall.

While this might seem like just some good old American capitalism at work, it’s also a cause for reflection. These are two of the largest outlets for book sales in the world, and although it might spell better deals for us, the consumers, it’s hardly an auspicious sign for the vitality of the industry. It’s even worse news for independent booksellers who aren’t able to compete at anything near the level of Sam Walton’s little corner store. But maybe the most interesting aspect of this is its implications for physical books themselves. Amazon’s pricing for these hardcovers is now lower than the $9.99 tag on most Kindle editions. Is this a sign that e-books are starting to have a depreciative effect on the genuine article? The inevitable might have just inched a little bit closer.

What do you think? Are you happy for the change in your pocket, or are you worried for the change in the market?

Oct 14 2009 12:52 PM ET

The National Book Awards: What Gives?

Sigh: It’s happened again. I don’t want to rag on any of the nominees picked by the National Book Award judges, but I’m simply stunned by some of the omissions. Where is Cheever: A Life, Blake Bailey’s monumental biography of John Cheever, which received raves everywhere, including this magazine? It redefined biography for me. Where is Dave Cullen’s Columbine, or Robin Romm’s searing The Mercy Papers? Where is David Mazzuchelli’s stunning graphic novel, Asterios Polyp? (For that matter, why does the NBA continues to largely ignore the graphic novel category, even though some of the best, most imaginative work is being done in that genre? I see Stitches received a YA nod, but…). Where is Abraham Verghese’s incredible Cutting for Stone? Stephanie Kallos’ lyrical novel Sing Them Home? Laurie Scheck’s A Monster’s Notes? Jonathan Tropper’s big-hearted family drama, This Is Where I Leave You? Don’t get me wrong: I absolutely think the NBA panels should look for small, overlooked books, especially those that come from small presses. But the list of nominees looks inconsequential — and the NBA looks a little silly — when the year’s truly great books are nowhere to be seen.

What do you think? Are there any books you think are missing, or are you pleased with the nominees?

Oct 14 2009 12:40 PM ET

National Book Award nominees: Plenty of surprises

The biggest surprise in this year’s list of nominees for the National Book Award, announced today, may be Michigan writer Bonnie Jo Campbell’s American Salvage, a story of working-class characters published by tiny Wayne State University Press. The other nominees come from more established publishers, though none is exactly a household name: Colum McCann’s Let the Great World Spin (a series of vignettes set in 1970s New York), Daniyal Mueenuddin’s In Other Rooms, Other Wonders (a collection of linked stories set on a large family farm in the Pakistani countryside), Jayne Anne Phillips’ Lark and Termite (the story of a teenage girl and her young half brother spending the summer with their aunt in West Virginia in 1959), and Marcel Theroux’s Far North (about a sheriff who might be the last citizen on the Arctic frontier).

In nonfiction, the nominees cover a broad range of topics, from the life of Cornelius Vanderbilt (T. J. Stiles’ The First Tycoon) to a Ford Motor Co.-built city in the jungles of the Amazon (Greg Grandin’s Fordlandia). The other nominees are: David M. Carroll’s Following the Water: A Hydromancer’s Notebook, Sean B. Carroll’s Remarkable Creatures: Epic Adventures in Search for the Origin of Species, and Adrienne Mayor’s The Poison King: The Life and Legend of Mithradates, Rome’s Deadliest Enemy.

In poetry, the nominees include familiar names — at least in the world of versifiers — like Ann Lauterbach (for Or to Begin Again) and Carl Phillips (for Speak Low) as well as Rae Armantrout’s Versed, Lyrae Van Clief-Stefanon’s Open Interval, and Keith Waldrop’s Transcendental Studies: A Trilogy.

The nominees in the young people’s literature category are a pretty diverse lot: two fact-based books as well as a surprising fixation on muteness. The fact-based books are Deborah Heiligman’s Charles and Emma: The Darwins’ Leap of Faith and Phillip Hoose’s Claudette Colvin: Twice Toward Justice, about a pre-Rosa Parks African American teen in 1955 who refused to give up her seat to white woman on a segregated bus in Montgomery, Ala. — but with a very different outcome than Ms. Parks’. The other nominees include David Small’s graphic novel Stitches (about a boy who wakes up mute from an operation he was told was harmless), Laini Taylor’s Lips Touch: Three Times (about three girls, one of whom grows up mute due to a curse), and Rita Williams-Garcia’s Jumped (a gritty story about three teens).

The winners, who receive $10,000 and a bronze statue, will be announced at the NBA’s 60th anniversary gala dinner on Nov 18. Both the nominees and the winners are selected by panels of four or five distinguished authors in each category. (This year’s fiction panel, for instance, consists of the award-winning powerhouses Alan Cheuse, Junot Diaz, Jennifer Egan, Charles Johnson, and Lydia Millet.)

Oct 14 2009 09:05 AM ET

The explicit books teens read (and the ones we read when we were their age)

43350518So I’m sitting on the train the other morning, minding my own business, my nose in a copy of Ellen Hopkins’ latest, Tricks. If you don’t know who the best-selling author Hopkins is, it’s because you don’t have a teenager in the house. Her utterly captivating books take on controversial and painful subject matter — abuse, drug use, family tragedy — in a most unusual form: They’re written in blank verse. I know you’re thinking, Yeah, right, what self-respecting teenager is going to read a novel written in free verse? The answer is: lots of them. I witnessed it first hand when my oldest daughter, then 13 or so, fell in love with Sonya Sones’ What My Mother Doesn’t Know, also written in free verse, and now I’m seeing it again with Hopkins, whose unadorned, unfettered narratives are very, very powerful.

But back to the train the other morning. I was lost in a copy of Tricks — which tackles teen prostitution — when I was startled back into reality by a woman from my town I know by sight, not by name. “I would never let my daughters read that,” she practically spat. “Do you know what she writes about?” I regarded her for a moment and said mildly, “You know, I don’t believe in censoring books.” “That’s your choice, of course, but I personally wouldn’t want my girls knowing any of this,” she replied. Honey, I thought to myself, I bet they already know most of it. But — and feel free to call me a coward — I didn’t say any of this her. (It’s just not worth it with some people.) I simply let myself get lost in the book’s lyricism again. READ FULL STORY »

Sep 23 2009 09:00 AM ET

Mackenzie Phillips details drug use and incest in new memoir

High-on-Arrival_lHigh on Arrival, a memoir from actress Mackenzie Phillips, hits stores today, the same day that Phillips will make the requisite trip to Oprah’s couch to bare all. Oprah’s website has been touting the interview all week: “Mackenzie Phillips speaks out on the heroin and cocaine bust, Mick Jagger and the explosive family secret she says she’s kept for 31 years.”

And just what is that secret? Phillips is best known as a TV star (One Day at a Time) and as the daughter of John Phillips (founding member of the Mamas & the Papas). But she is also an addict, and hers is a book not about celebrity life, but about the frantic, unremitting scramble to get high. She did her best to obliterate a miserable childhood by shooting, snorting, and swallowing every drug possible. She says she was raped at 14 by a stranger and at 19 by her own father, then continued a pattern of using and detoxing until an August 2008 drug arrest at LAX forced her, she says, to embrace sobriety once and for all. Though Phillips’ incest revelations will make the headlines, the rest of the book — a raw glimpse into the mind of a junkie — is equally dispiriting. “It was, as I’ve said, a hard decision to reveal the sordid side of my relationship with my father,” she writes in the book’s afterword. “But these are complex, painful, heart-wrenching truths that infiltrate lives, many lives, not just mine. I can’t be the only one. And I needed to tell that part of the story because I wanted to earn the right to talk about forgiveness.”

What do you think? Is this a book you’ll read?

For more on Mackenzie Phillips: Clark Collis’ article in The Music Mix

Sep 18 2009 04:35 PM ET

Uwem Akpan: The first post-Oprah interview

We had a chance to chat briefly this afternoon with Uwem Akpan, the Nigerian-born Jesuit priest whose short story collection, Say You’re One Of Them, was anointed by Oprah hours ago as her next Book Club pick.

Do I call you Father Akpan?

Actually, you call me Father Uwem.

Father Uwem, how do you reconcile two powerful callings — that of being a priest and that of being a writer?

They both require time and commitment and energy. But when you are writing fiction, you can set your characters aside. I can’t manipulate the people of my parish. If someone needs counseling, they need counseling. If someone is dead, they need to be buried. But the two callings also go together. For anyone to be a success on the pulpit, they must be a storyteller: They are using words to get into the heart of the congregation. Don’t forget that Jesus was a priest and a poet.

Are you currently on a church posting?

Yes, I have a parish in Lagos.

Does the church vet your writing?

I have permission to write, but I do not need an imprimatur from the church — that is more for people who are writing about theology and philosophy. They see that I am writing fiction and assume it is made up. I suppose it’s possible one day they could pose questions.

Are you working on another book yet?

Not yet. My parish has been very busy.

What kinds of books do you like to read?

I read the Bible a lot — other than that I am very eclectic. The stories from the Bible still amaze and baffle me. I especially like reading the Old Testament.

How did it feel when you learned Oprah had picked your book?

I couldn’t tell anyone because the contract was so full of confidentiality agreements. It was surreal. I’m very, very humbled by all of it.

Thank you, Father Uwem.

No, thank you. Entertainment Weekly has been very good to me.

Sep 18 2009 10:37 AM ET

The return of Dan Brown: An interview with the author of 'The Lost Symbol'

Everybody has an opinion about Dan Brown. Some love the 45-year-old best-selling author of The Da Vinci Code and have already snapped up their copy of The Lost Symbol, which went on sale Sept. 15. Others suggest that he represents all that is bland and over-processed in publishing today. When I met with Brown, I found him pleasant and likable, even comfortably dorky. Here’s some of what he had to say (you can read the complete profile in this week’s EW).

You published two novels to little fanfare before The Da Vinci Code. At what point did you realize your days of obscurity were over?

I was out in Portland on book tour when I got news that it was debuting at #1. And I was all alone. I don’t even remember if I had a cellphone. I walked into the hotel where I was staying and the front desk said “Mr. Brown, we have a fax for you.” And it was just a huge number one. (wiping tears from his eyes) I still have that fax. It’s in a scrapbook.

With all the hoopla surrounding the publication of The Lost Symbol, do you miss that sensation of being newly discovered?

Now there’s enormous anticipation, enormous expectation. If the book weren’t good I’d be terrified. There’s so many critics who complain that I’m not William Shakespeare or William Faulkner or whoever it is. That’s exactly the point. They’re right. I write books in a very specific and intentional way, blending fact and fiction, writing in a very modern, efficient style that just serves the story. Some people understand what I’m doing and other people should just go read somebody else.

READ FULL STORY »

Sep 16 2009 03:22 PM ET

Dan Brown's 'The Lost Symbol' breaks first-day records

Dan Brown’s latest historical/conspiratorial/symbological mystery had a stellar first day, selling more than one million copies in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. Amazon and Barnes & Noble reported that The Lost Symbol broke their records for first-day sales of an adult fiction book. “Adult,” in this case, being shorthand for “not Harry Potter.”

The e-book edition also posted big sales, and is currently the top seller for the Amazon Kindle.

Suzanne Herz of Knopf Doubleday says that this kind of fervent response was absolutely what the publisher expected. “There is no comparison,” she said, between The Lost Symbol‘s success and the early sales of Brown’s other novels. Anticipating massive demand, the publisher had to go back to press immediately prior to release in order to print an additional 600,000 copies (bringing the total number to 5.6 million).

According to Carolyn Brown, spokeswoman for Barnes & Noble, the book exploded past previous first-day records. “No other adult fiction title even comes close.”  And what’s more, it may be spurring readers to buy other titles, too. “It is early, but so far we have seen a lift in sales of books about Freemasonry and secret societies, followed closely by those about early Christianity (Gnostic Gospels).  We think interest in these genres will continue to be strong as the topics appeal to Brown’s core audience,” said Patricia Bostelman, vice president of marketing for Barnes & Noble, Inc.  “As people read more from The Lost Symbol, we expect that the more esoteric titles and books about hermetics, noetics, quantum physics should start to gather momentum.  And  anything about the hidden mysteries and history of Washington are sure to see a pop as well.”

Brown’s sequel to his massively successful 2003 hit, The Da Vinci Code, a cultural symbol in its own right, finds his popular protagonist Robert Langdon back in the United States, returned from his two-book European vacation, and faced with another series of cryptic clues and shadowy goings-on. Fans are clearly excited at the prospect of another go-round with their favorite (likely by default) Harvard symbologist. Like one of Brown’s beloved ambigrams, whether read backwards or forwards, this spells major success for the author.

Sep 14 2009 10:33 AM ET

Dan Brown speaks: The first interview about 'Da Vinci Code' sequel 'The Lost Symbol'

Fans have held their breath for six years for Dan Brown’s follow-up to his blockbuster novel The Da Vinci Code, which sold an astounding 80 million copies worldwide. The wait finally ends at midnight tonight when readers can finally get their hands on The Lost Symbol, which follows Harvard’s Robert Langdon as he become enmeshed in a mystery involving the history of the Freemasons in Washington, D.C. Why such a long wait? In a rare interview appearing in this week’s issue, Brown tells Entertainment Weekly that during his long absence from the public eye, he made himself a promise. “I will not write a lame follow-up. It could take me 20 years. But I will never turn in a book that I’m not happy with. Four years ago, I wasn’t happy with the book. Five years ago, I wasn’t happy with the book.” Finally, amidst a flurry of articles trumpeting the 45-year-old author as the white knight come to resuscitate a wheezing publishing industry, he felt ready to return. “And if the book weren’t good,” he says confidently, “I’d be terrified.”

Brown makes it clear he didn’t spent that last six years procrastinating. “I write seven days a week, starting at 4 o’clock in the morning, including Christmas,” he says. “I worked on this book at 4 in the morning in my hotel room while I was living in London and going to court. I’ve probably written 10 novels worth of pages to write The Lost Symbol.” The first review, from the New York Times, has already hit the Internet — and it’s a rave.

Brown, however, knows not all critics are in love with his work, something he learned the hard way. “The Da Vinci Code had the audacity to park at No. 1 for a little bit too long,” he says. “And it became very en vogue just to trash my books.”

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP
'Star Trek': I'd rather be...