Shelf Life Book news, reviews, trends, and talk

Category: Books (71-80 of 1946)

On the Books: Book about Reagan's rise stirs controversy

The-Invisible-Bridge

Chris Ashby, a lawyer representing Reagan’s Revolution author Craig Shirley, has cited 19 instances of duplicated wording and insufficient or incomplete attribution from Shirley’s text in Rick Perlstein’s The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan, the new 856-page third volume in Perlstein’s history of politics in the 1960s and 1970s, The New York Times reports. According to the Times, Shirley’s lawyer has asked for a public apology and $25 million in damages, and has requested that revisions be made to digital editions and that all physical copies of the book be destroyed. Shirley said he has since found almost 50 instances of his work being used without credit.

Perlstein, however, told The New York Times that he cited Shirley’s book 125 times on his website, where he posted his source notes. “These are paraphrases,” Perlstein said. “I’m reverent toward my sources. History is a team sport, and references are how you support your teammates.”

Perlstein and his publisher published endnotes online instead of at the back of the book, because an in-print endnote section would have ballooned the book’s page count to more than 1,000, and because online endnotes can be more extensive than print ones. “My notion is that people will read this book with their iPhones open,” Perlstein said. Other publishers and academics remain apprehensive about publishing sources online, saying that the documentation can be lost, or that the URL may no longer work in the future. [The New York Times]

Patti Smith reviews Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki and His Years of Pilgrimage by Haruki Murakami. “This is a book for both the new and experienced reader. It has a strange casualness, as if it unfolded as Murakami wrote it; at times, it seems like a prequel to a whole other narrative. The feel is uneven, the dialogue somewhat stilted, either by design or flawed in translation. Yet there are moments of epiphany gracefully expressed, especially in regard to how people affect one another.” [The New York Times]

Libraries are struggling with ebook lending, according to a report from the International Federation of Library Associations. Many publishers have inconsistent licensing practices, so libraries have trouble keeping many of them consistently available. Furthermore, they face competition from growing commercial ebook subscription services like Kindle Unlimited, Oyster, and Scribd. [Publishers Weekly]

The market for anti-Hillary Clinton books is booming, which might be a good sign for Clinton. [The Christian Science Monitor]

Lev Grossman on 'The Magician's Land': 'It felt like a world ending'

magicians-land

Lev Grossman’s Magicians fantasy trilogy comes to a close this week with The Magician’s Land (out Tuesday). In the books, Quentin Coldwater is whisked off to Brakebills, a wizarding college. Once he graduates, he and his friends are dumped into the real world and struggle to find meaning in a place where not everything is easy and normal. Subverting conventions of fantasy series like The Chronicles of Narnia, Quentin discover Fillory, a Narnia-esque world where he and his friends are crowned as royalty, but then become disenchanted once again.

The Magician’s Land brings the story to its culmination. EW spoke to novelist and Time book critic Lev Grossman about The Magician’s Land, what else he’s working on, and more.

This interview contains some spoilers, and has been condensed and edited.

EW: What got me into the Magicians series in the first place is the ‘Harry Potter for adults’ tagline. But I think as the story has gone on, you’re drawing more from the Narnia books than from the Harry Potter books. Was that transition intentional?
LEV GROSSMAN: The first half of The Magicians is obviously, among other things, kind of glossing on Harry Potter. But in a way, if it’s influenced by something, if it’s a response to something, it’s much more a response to C.S. Lewis, which makes sense. I’m a big Harry Potter fan; I love Harry Potter. One of the reasons I wrote this is because I was in between Order of the Phoenix and Half-Blood Prince and I needed something to get me through the way. But I’m old. I first read Harry Potter when I was probably 30. Whereas C.S. Lewis is really in my bones. That’s, like, genetically coded in my cells because I read it so early. The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe was probably one of the first chapter books I ever read, and it kind of imprinted itself on me.

One of the interesting things about Quentin is how he interacts with authority. At school, he was a sort of rebellious figure. And later on, he deals with the gods of Fillory. In The Magician’s Land, he goes back to Brakebills to become a teacher. Why did you decide to put him on the other side of things?
It’s interesting, isn’t it? I wanted to get back to Brakebills because it’s a lot of fun to write about Brakebills. The series is so identified with Brakebills, but really you only spend the first half of The Magicians there, and that’s the end, and it’s hardly in The Magician King at all. So I knew I wanted to go back there. In order for him to finish growing up, I felt like Quentin had to go back and become one of these authority figures that he had hated when he was younger, and understand who it was that he hated, and what these people were actually about.

It’s funny, Quentin has a kind of rebellious streak, but as you’ll notice, he’s relatively obedient to authority. He goes to school, and he can be pissed off at the professors, but he works incredibly hard. He still wants the grades. So he has this sort of weird thing where he’s angry but also craving the approval of authorities. Again, which is something he has to work out a bit in The Magician’s Land, which is the reason I brought in his father, because Quentin is obviously a guy with some psychological stuff to work out, and that stuff all started out in his family, which is something which I hadn’t talked about so much.

One of the engines that drives the book as a whole is Quentin going back to places that he’s been to before. When you go back someplace where you haven’t been for a few years, you feel so conscious of how you’ve changed, and whoever you were when you were there last. And I wanted Quentin to be conscious of that, and the reader, too, to sense how much has changed. And in some ways, he faces up to people that he couldn’t face up to the first time he met them.

One thing you’ve talked about before is taking care to write this book as an ending to a trilogy. Revisiting the places he’s been and noticing how he’s changed is a part of that conclusion process, the growing up part. I think another thing you deal with, even within the text, is wish fulfillment, how one wants something to happen in a fantasy series, or a fantasy world, like Fillory itself, and how you as an author might want to deny or give into those conventions.
It’s something that was happening throughout the series. I didn’t want the series to be sort of anti-fantasy, like something terrible has to happen and everything has to become mediocre and boring. I wrote this series because I love fantasy. It’s kind of a critique of fantasy on one level, but more importantly, it’s a fantasy novel and it’s supposed to give you what you want from fantasy novels. So I had to figure out a way to end things that was not entirely conventional, but still satisfying.

I kind of saw Fillory as a place where, because of what happens to it in the book, you can deal with the expectations of what might be a happily-ever-after kind of ending, versus refusing to give it to fans.
Yeah, the whole point of the books is trying to write one of these books like these books I grew up on, that I love, like C.S. Lewis and Rowling, but also Ursula Le Guin and Philip Pullman, but somehow inflected by the realities if an adult life, and shedding any sort of fairy tale dewiness.

Right, Quentin isn’t a “chosen one.”
It was important that when Quentin realizes who he is, he doesn’t go, “Oh, I’m a special boy. My parents were secretly kings and queens.” And that’s something I take a hatchet to pretty early on. Quentin is not going to be secretly anybody’s special child. He is who he always thought he was, which is nobody special.

Or, if he is someone special, it’s because he makes it that way.
Because he makes it that way, right. He doesn’t inherit anything.

This new book dips into the apocalypse genre, with Fillory. Why did you decide to go there, and did you think about how that narrative plays into the genre as a whole?
The big influence on me from an apocalyptic point of view—and this is the most pretentious thing I will ever hope to say in an interview—the thing I really was responding to was the apocalypse narrative in “The Wasteland” by T.S. Eliot, which in turn comes up a lot out of The Golden Bough, which was a turn-of-the-century work of anthropology. It was a cross-cultural survey of mythology and anthropology. The guy who wrote it, James Frazer, kind of came up with this master narrative. The world’s ending, and the world’s dying, and then coming back to life. And when Eliot wrote about it, he wasn’t thinking the world was actually ending, but he felt like the culture and civilization he was in was dying, and it had to be restored somehow. And I thought a lot about that, too. Obviously, literally, Fillory is dying in the books, but I felt kind of the dying feeling of the world that we’re in, and what it would mean to bring it back to life.

In addition to feeling that about the world at large, did that feeling come from writing the end of this series that has occupied your life for so long?
Yeah, there’s something there. I was very aware that this little universe was coming to an end. There was something very compelling about tearing it down.

And saving it.
And then saving it. But, you know, it did feel like a world ending, in a very real way.

Well, one think we can look forward to about The Magicians is that SyFy is working on a TV adaptation. You know, when the Harry Potter books ended, there was a sense of an ending, but not that it was completely over. We had more more to look forward to, at least for awhile.
I feel bad about not writing this characters anymore, so it’s very soothing and consoling that the cycle’s going to start again in a different medium, even though I’m not writing it myself.

Are you involved at all with the TV series?
When the writers finish a draft of a script, I read the draft, and then I give them notes on it. They are in no way held to listen to me. I think I have a title and it’s something like “creative consultant.” So I have no real power, but I read the drafts and I respond to them. But I don’t write anything, I don’t write dialogue, nothing. Not a single word of it is mine.

How do you feel about that?
I feel good. But it’s definitely an adjustment. Every novelist has a little bit of control freak in them. It’s a control freak’s medium. Because when you’re writing a novel, you get to do it all. You write the dialogue, and you play all the parts, and you dress the set, you do the costumes. So handing it off to other people is a weird kind of out-of-body experience. But it’s also a relief, and it’s amazingly interesting to see what other people do with the same raw materials, stuff I never would have thought of. There’s a lot to enjoy, and I’m trying to enjoy that part. But it’s tough to let go.

In The Magicians Land, you introduce Plum, who has a certain stability that the other women in the series don’t have.
A certain stability? Like mental stability?

Yes.
Plum’s in there partly because I wanted to have an undergraduate through whose eyes we could see Brakebills a little bit. But I wanted a character who was high-functioning. Most other characters whose point of view we see have major disorders of one sort or another. Plum has a dark side, she’s got her secret that she’s hiding. But she’s very high-functioning, she’s very engaged with the world, she’s got a great sense of humor, a great sense of joy, and a can-do attitude. She doesn’t mope. That’s not who she is. I strongly, in the earlier books, identified magical ability and power with a sense of pain, that it was something that broken people can do. And I wanted to see what kind of power a happy magician would have, or a stable magician would have. She’s there because—it wasn’t feasible, narratively speaking, to give him a child, but I wanted someone where he was in a kind of mentor relationship with, that he felt responsible for, which was a new kind of relationship for him, but I felt it was a good one. At the same time, he needed someone who could stand up to him and give him s–t. I wanted him to have a strong bond with a woman that he had no romantic tie to, a totally platonic bond, which he has, but not enough of.

You occupy these two worlds, as a critic and as a novelist. What’s that like?
It’s a balancing act, and not one I do, I think, particularly gracefully. I always wanted to write fiction, that was all I ever wanted to do. And my career as a critic took off before my career as a fiction writer did. So a lot of people see me as a critic first, but I think of myself as a novelist who occasionally writes book reviews. I don’t know, I mean, there’s no particular reason why someone can’t do both. Certainly, the early history of the novel, like in the eighteenth century, everyone did everything. There wasn’t this kind of artificial separation between critics and fiction writers. I do, on the occasions when I socialize with my novelist peers, I sometimes feel conscious if I’ve reviewed any of them. I get the sense that they’re saying, “Well, you’re just one of us. What gives you the right to judge me?” And I think, “Nothing.” I have no right at all. So it’s an uncomfortable balancing act that I haven’t really figured out how to do.

I would never review a friend’s book, but that doesn’t come up very often, because I don’t have many friends who write books. People imagine the separation between critics and writers as some kind of absolute church-state thing. Everybody ends up meeting everybody. It’s very gray. You won’t find a critic who’s absolutely pure and doesn’t know any authors. That doesn’t exist. It’s not a hermetic seal. One just tries to do one’s best.

I started writing at Publishers Weekly, that was where I published my first reviews. And at the time, I was a web developer, and I just wanted to put my foot in the literary world somehow, and that was how I did it, and then it kind of escalated.

What’s next for you?
I haven’t talked about it much. Obviously, the TV show, I’m going to be involved in that in a consulting way. So that will be going on. But what I really want to do is write more books. I wrote about half of a novel while I was working on The Magician’s Land, which I’m now starting to go back to and rewrite, and move along a little bit. But I have a lot of ideas. I’ve been working in the Magicians-verse exclusively for ten years. I haven’t written a word of fiction set outside it. So I’m very ready to get back into world-building, and to strike out some fresh directions. I have four or five files on my computer, all of which represent different novels that I might bite next, and I keep sort of hopping from one to the other, and figuring out which next one I’ll go to.

As a fiction writer, do you see yourself as exclusively a novelist, or would you write short stories out of these ideas?
I don’t tend to write short stories. Why that is, I have no idea. But I’m not very good at them. Before I wrote my first novel, I must have written 100, 150 short stories, none of which were ever published. I began to realize that I just don’t work very well in that kind of confined space. I really need that big canvas of the novel to open up. I have written short things, but really there’s exactly one true short story in the Magicians universe ["The Girl in the Mirror"] for an anthology [Dangerous Women]. And some excerpts were anthologized, but they weren’t short stories, they were really just chapters. I probably won’t write more short fiction. It just doesn’t interest me that much. That’s my problem, not short fiction’s problem.

What’s your next novel about?
I can’t say. I haven’t even talked to my agent about it. I’d better pitch it to her before I get into it. But it’s not literary fiction. It’s not fantasy, either, but it’s not reality. It’s about impossible things happening, but I don’t think I can go any further than that.

'Where the Heart Is' author Billie Letts dies at 76

Billie Letts, the author of the bestselling novel Where the Heart Is, has died. She was 76, and according to her son Tracy Letts, she died of pneumonia.

Letts taught at Southeastern Oklahoma State University and published her first book, Where the Heart Is, about a pregnant teenager abandoned by her boyfriend and stranded in a WalMart, in 1995. When the book was released in paperback, it caught the eye of Oprah Winfrey, who featured the novel on her television show.

Winfrey’s endorsement shot the book up bestseller lists. The novel has sold more than 3 million copies worldwide, according to The New York Times. In 2000, a film adaptation of the book was released, starring Natalie Portman and Ashley Judd. Dennis Letts, Billie’s husband, and also had a role in the movie—he became an actor once he retired from teaching.

After publishing Where the Heart Is, Letts wrote three more novels—The Honk and Holler Opening SoonMade in the U.S.A., and Shoot the Moon.

She is survived by three children: Dana Letts, Shawn Letts, and playwright Tracy Letts. Tracy won the Pulitzer Prize for Drama for August: Osage County, which was adapted into a 2013 movie starring Meryl Streep.

See the cover of 'A Year in the Life of Downton Abbey'

Year-in-the-Life-of-Downton-Abbey

Season 5 of Downton Abbey doesn’t premiere in the U.S. until Jan. 4, 2015, but on Oct. 28, St. Martin’s Press will whet Americans’ Downton appetites with A Year in the Life of Downton Abbey, the official tie-in book to the PBS Masterpiece series. A Year in the Life is written by Jessica Fellowes—the niece of Julian Fellowes, the show’s writer and creator. READ FULL STORY

George R.R. Martin's children's book 'The Ice Dragon' to be republished

ice-dragon

Same author, different dragons.

The Telegraph reports that George R.R. Martin, author of the popular Song of Ice and Fire books which have been adapted into the Game of Thrones series, has announced plans to republish his children’s book The Ice Dragon. The story was initially published as part of the 1980 anthology, Dragons of Light, edited by Orson Scott Card, and then republished as a stand-alone book in 2007. The new edition, by Tor books, will feature artwork by Spanish artist Luis Royo. It will arrive on shelves October 21 this year.

READ FULL STORY

What We're Reading Now: 'California' by Edan Lepucki

California-by-Edan-Lepucki

You know how when you’re watching a horror movie and you want to cover your eyes, there’s always someone who yells, “Don’t cover your eyes! Your imagination is scarier than the film,” and you find yourself peeking through tense fingers?

California, by Edan Lepucki’s debut novel, relies on similar logic.

Set in post-apocalyptic America—an indeterminate time after society has collapsed—we meet Cal and Frida in the wilderness of California. Vague references are made to the crises (earthquakes, killer storms, profound economic disparity, empowered terrorist cells, rampant crime) that drove them here—but that’s the only detail that’s offered for many, many pages. The end of the world is as much our own construction as Lepucki’s. Do we know why the government gave up? Nope. Do we know when it gave up? Not really. Was there a usurper? Doesn’t seem like it, but it’s possible. READ FULL STORY

On the Books: HarperCollins to cut offending passage from 'American Sniper'

HarperCollins is removing the passage that won Jesse Ventura a $1.8 million defamation lawsuit against the estate of author and former Navy SEAL Chris Kyle. Ventura said that, in American Sniper, Kyle quoted him saying the SEALs “deserved to lose a few.” HarperCollins didn’t say how it would be removing the passage, or if it will modify already-purchased ebooks. [ABC News/The Associated Press]

Lois Lowry talks about writing sequels for The Giver, how young adult literature has changed, and the long process of adapting the book to film. “I remember seeing the costume designs for the female lead, Fiona—in the book she’s 12, and in the movie she’s 16. I advised them that some of the costumes were too sexy. And so the hem was dropped a little bit. I asked them: ‘Please don’t turn this into a teenage romance.'” [The New York Times Magazine] READ FULL STORY

On the Books: Lost Dr. Seuss stories to be published as picture book

horton-and-the-kwuggerbug

Theodor Geisel’s golden years were the 1950s, when he published Horton Hears a Who! (1955), The Cat in the Hat (1957), and How the Grinch Stole Christmas (1957), as well as the screenplay for The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T. He also published a few short stories in Redbook magazine. Random House is now publishing Horton and the Kwuggerbug and More Lost Stories, a collection of stories from the Redbook days, adding illustrations, and releasing it as a picture book in September. [The Guardian]

Before his untimely death last year, Pulitzer-Prize winning novelist Oscar Hijuelos was working on a novel more ambitious than anything else he wrote: It’s a 859-page historical novel about Mark Twain and Henry Morton Stanley, the famous explorer who found missionary Robert Livingstone in central Africa. He finished the manuscript before he died, and now Hijuelos’ widow is pursuing publication. The novel, Twain and Stanley Enter Paradise, will be published in the fall of 2015 along with an unpublished short story. Hijuelos’ wife also said he had another 700-page manuscript written, but she doesn’t currently plan to publish it. “I see Twain and Stanley as Oscar’s crowning achievement,” she said. [The New York Times] READ FULL STORY

British council names garbage truck for David Sedaris

Earlier this week, the West Sussex County Times published a charming little article about a local hero “who devotes a great deal of time and energy to walking many miles clearing litter from near where he lives as well as surrounding areas.” The district’s government is so thankful for his tireless work that they’ve decided to give him the ultimate honor: They’re naming a garbage truck after him.

The litter-picker’s name? David Sedaris.

Yep—that David Sedaris, bestselling author of Me Talk Pretty One DayNaked, and countless endlessly amusing essays for The New Yorker, not to mention umpteen NPR segments. He moved to the English countryside with his longtime partner, Hugh Hamrick, three years ago. READ FULL STORY

Warner Brothers creates Harry Potter Global Franchise Development team

Harry Potter has his own book series, his own movies, his own theme parks, and now he’s getting his own team: Warner Brothers just announced they’re launching a Harry Potter Global Franchise Development team to foster relations with Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling and to continue expanding the ever-growing Potter empire.

READ FULL STORY

Latest Videos in Books

Advertisement

From Our Partners

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP