Author: Benjamin Svetkey (1-4 of 4)

Dec 16 2011 01:05 AM ET

Christopher Hitchens, author and talk show regular, dies at 62

Tagged:
christopher-hitchens

Image Credit: David Levenson/Getty Images

Christopher Hitchens, author, polemicist, and always-controversial talk show personality, died at the MD Anderson Cancer Center, in Houston, after a battle with esophageal cancer, reports Vanity Fair. He was 62. The British intellectual published his 11th book in spring 2010, a personal memoir called Hitch-22. It was aptly titled, since the man himself was full of contradictions. He was a self-described internationalist socialist who was also a fierce supporter of the war in Iraq. He was a ferocious opponent of Muslim extremism — “fascism with an Islamic face,” he called it — but also a critic of Christianity and all other organized religions (his 2007 book was titled God Is Not Great). Like Gore Vidal — his one-time mentor, until Hitchens publicly called him as a “crackpot” — he was most famous for being a highly entertaining contrarian. (You can check out a clip of some of his best TV appearances below.)  READ FULL STORY »

Apr 26 2010 11:45 AM ET

Kid Lit 101: Dog spelled backwards in Lucy Cousins' 'I'm the Best'

From Othello to Ahab, great literary characters have wrestled with the classic mortal failing of hubris. Usually, it ends with a tragic downfall, but in I’m The Best, Lucy Cousins’ latest masterpiece (we’re also fans of the author’s shorter works, the tiny board books about Maisy the mouse), the plot takes a more forgiving twist.

The protagonist is a self-involved hound in checkered pants named “Dog.” He grows more arrogant with every turn of the page. “Hello, I’m Dog, and I’m the best,” he introduces himself to the reader, skipping through a meadow of water-colored flowers. “These are my friends—Ladybug, Mole, Goose, and Donkey. I love them. They’re great, but I’m the best.” For the first half of the story, Dog is brutishly solipsistic, constantly proving his supposed god-like superiority by running faster than Mole, digging holes deeper than Goose, or swimming better than Donkey. After each victory, Dog always insufferably pronounces, “I’m the best.”

But like Shakespeare’s jealous Moor and Melville’s loony fisherman, Dog gets his comeuppance. “Actually,” Mole informs him midway into the story, “I can dig holes much longer and much deeper than you, Dog. So I win. I’m the best.” Dog’s other friends turn on him, too: Goose proves that she can swim faster, and Ladybug demonstrates that she can fly higher. Dog is humiliated and reduced to tears. The world, as he knew it, has been destroyed. “I’m horrible at everything,” he cries. “I’m just a silly show-off.”

Had Shakespeare or Melville written this tale, they might have lowered the curtain here, ending with ironic pathos. But Cousins has a kinder heart. In the last few pages, Dog’s friends forgive him and they all embrace in a group hug. “Don’t worry, Dog,” they tell him. “You are the best at being our best friend. And you are the best at having beautiful fluffy ears. And we love you.” Dog is so relieved, he falls right back into character. “Oh phew!” he says. “Obviously having beautiful fluffy ears is the most important thing. So I AM the best.”

Like all great works of literature, it ends where it begins.

Mar 10 2010 05:03 PM ET

Kid Lit 101: Piggie and Elephant are better than Beckett

Alienation. Fear of abandonment. The existential agony of being alone in the universe. These are the heavy literary themes that fill the pages of I Am Going, Mo Willems’ latest masterpiece in his epic “Elephant & Piggie” series of story books.

For those unfamiliar with Willems’ oeuvre—which includes such major works as My Friend is Sad, There is a Bird on Your Head, and Pigs Make Me Sneeze—Elephant and Piggie are the Vladimir and Estragon of children’s literature. Gerald is a nervous, needy elephant in wire-rim eyewear. Piggie (he appears to have no other name) is a more self-assured, impetuous hog. I Am Going opens with the pair engaged in mundane Godot-like dialogue. “This is a good day,” a smiling Gerald tells Piggie as the two sit together in the vast emptiness of a otherwise blank page. “Just like yesterday,” Piggie replies, rather noncommitally. “Yes!” Gerald goes on. “Yesterday was a good day, too.” At which point, Piggie shocks Gerald by abruptly announcing that he is leaving. Suddenly, eight pages into the book, the plot shifts gears to become a harrowing psycho-domestic drama that would have Edward Albee reaching for the whiskey to steady his nerves.

Why is Piggie in such a rush to depart? Why has he decided to leave the elephant alone? Gerald implores Piggie to stay, becoming increasingly desperate at Piggie’s determination not to. He cycles through the entire range of human (and elephant) emotion, from panic (“You are going?! ) to self-pity (“Who will I skip with?”). Ultimately, Gerald resorts to physical violence to keep Piggie from abandoning him. He squeezes Piggie in an elephant hug while shouting at the top of his lungs, “I WILL NOT LET YOU GO!!!” Alas, Piggie simply pops free from the embrace and coolly repeats, “I am going.”

In the end, happily, Piggie has a perfectly reasonable explanation for going, and by page 56, elephant and hog are merrily together again enjoying lunch. Like all great literary classics, the plot comes full circle, with both friends once again having a good day.

Feb 25 2010 10:00 AM ET

Kid Lit 101: Deconstructing 'Little Quack'

As a new parent, I’ve recently started paying more attention to children’s story books. Bear cubs at bath time. Lost little llamas looking for their mamas. That sort of reading material. But what I’ve discovered is that in even the world of kiddie lit, you can never judge a book by its cover, no matter how cloyingly cute and cuddly the baby animal on it is. Indeed, there is often more literary subtext padding these chunky little children’s tomes than in a Jonathan Franzen novel.

Take, for instance, the new Little Quack series from Little Simon, written by Lauren Thompson and illustrated by Derek Anderson. Its protagonist is a young, impetuous duckling named Little Quack, who wanders through the woods around his idyllic pond on a seemingly innocent journey of self-discovery. In Little Quack Loves Colors, for instance, Little Quack is joined by another duckling named Piddle, and the two frolic through the forest pointing out different colors they each love. Little Quack loves “yellow buttercups,” but Piddle prefers “red ladybugs.” Over the next 16 pages, though, the tension builds and the mood darkens. As the two characters continue to pick different colors, it becomes increasingly clear they can never agree on anything. They both become locked in their own color bias. The metaphor for American political bifurcation is all too obvious; each duckling is totally unable to see past his own ideology, and therefore unable to pass meaningful health care legislation for the pond. In the end, Little Quack and Piddle finally agree that they both love “oozy brown.” But is that a sign of hope? Or are they both merely slinging mud?

Little Quack Counts, thankfully, offers a more upbeat storyline. In this volume, Little Quack has a different sidekick, a Sancho Panza-esque duckling named Widdle, and together they embark on an ambitious mathematical quest to count everything they see in the woods. “Little Quack and Widdle see 1 butterfly.” “Little Quack and Widdle see 4 flowers.” Little Quack’s name always comes first, establishing the social hierarchy of the relationship, but it’s still more of a partnership than with Piddle. There’s no way they can ever complete their assignment of counting everything—it is, ultimately, an existential mission—but at least they count together, not at each other. And when crisis strikes—“5 bees! Oh, no!”—the two friends hug each other for comfort, before paddling away to a safer part of the pond, into the warm waiting wings of “1 Mama Duck.” As with every classic literary journey, this one ends by returning home.

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP