Sep 30 2011 01:02 PM ET

Roger Ebert talks 'Life Itself': 'I wasn't reviewing a movie, I was reviewing myself.'

Roger-Ebert-from-Oprah

Image Credit: oprah.com

I’ve been reading Roger Ebert’s film reviews for as many years as I can remember, but one review for the 2001 gore-fest Jason X stands out. He began his review by responding to one character’s line, “This sucks on so many levels, writing: “[It's] rare for a movie to so frankly describe itself. Jason X sucks on the levels of storytelling, character development, suspense, special effects, originality, punctuation, neatness and aptness of thought.” All of which is to say that anyone who has ever come across Ebert’s written reviews or TV appearances over the last four decades knows that this man was born with that thing so many writers struggle to find: A voice.

When, after a battle with thyroid cancer, he had to have his jaw removed in 2006, one of the many tragedies was that Ebert lost his ability to speak. And  yet, as fate often strangely goes, it was this very circumstance that ultimately motivated Ebert to give his voice its greatest, most vulnerable chance to shine yet — in his recently released memoir Life Itself. This Tuesday, joined by his wife Chaz and spoken for by his computer voice “Alex,” Ebert sat with New York Times Chief Film Critic A.O. Scott for a TimesTalks about his life, career, and how his darkest days inspired what is the most personal review he has ever written: The review of his own life.

The seed for Life Itself began when Ebert was in the hospital after his operation. He began blogging to curb the feelings of isolation. He explained, “It was a way to express myself and convince myself I still had a voice.” He began to interact frequently with his readers, though, he admitted at first only because “I didn’t want any trolls on my blog telling me I sucked.” Ultimately, blogging “cheered me up,” said Ebert. Then, the daily diversion began to take on more meaning. “Memories kept springing from the back of my mind,” he recalled. Though he thought he’d never write a book about himself, he was beginning to think a memoir was a real prospect.

For someone who’s spent his entire life writing about others, Ebert faced a unique challenge: “I wasn’t reviewing a movie, I was reviewing myself.” He had to grapple with some “painful” and “intense” matters like his ideas on death and the afterlife. His personal stance? “I don’t believe in an afterlife. I was born from a void to which I will return…. I am the total of my memories, and once they’re gone, so will I be, but that doesn’t bother me.” He knew this perspective would be controversial but ultimately decided, “Since I was only going to write it once, I might as well be honest.”

Life Itself was only one of a number of subjects Ebert covered in his TimesTalk. He discussed his fairly recent allegiance to Facebook and Twitter — for the record, he has 530,000 Twitter followers, which he quipped that he’s still “not up there with Justin Bieber” — which he uses to advertise when his favorite movies are streaming on Netflix. Yes, Roger Ebert, is pro-Netflix. He is most definitely not pro-3D, which he dismissed as an “abomination” and deemed “a waste of a perfectly good dimension.” And, showing a side of himself from the Siskel & Ebert days, when Scott begged to differ, Ebert asked with a pointed finger a glint in his eyes, “You’re not seriously telling me you like it, are you?”

That said, Ebert is not worried about who will follow in his footsteps after he’s gone because he thinks “we’re in a new golden age of [film] criticism right now because of the Internet.” He admitted he never imagined he would be writing about movies today, but that his love for movies “has only grown over the years.” Having gone through intense personal struggle and lived to tell the tale, Ebert affirmed, “I’m happy that I’m still here today.”

Read more:
EW Review: Life Itself
Three great anecdotes from Roger Ebert’s moving new memoir, ‘Life Itself’
The Must List: What’s Hot for the Week of Sept. 12, 2011

Comments (17 total) Add your comment
Page:
  • pie thrower

    All my best to you Roger. Though I disagree with you on most of your political views, you have been an inspiration to me since I was child on how to appreciate the gifts that films bring to us on a cultural level.

    You inspire to always think analytically and that has helped shape me as a person.

    Again, thank you.

  • Joe

    I love that man so much; his blog has been a wonder to me for many years.

  • Manny

    Siskel & Ebert At The Movies was like a lifeline for me as a kid. Thank you, Roger – you have made an impact on those around you (unlike those pesky internet trolls…)

  • Felix

    Mr. Ebert, you are fantastic. Your blistering war against this god-awful 3D fad gives me hope for the future of movies.

  • asher

    Still the greatest film reviewer writing today…his reviews have that personal factor that so many others are missing.

  • Penny Widmo’

    He’s married to Chaz. :giggles:

    • Fred

      She’s a bright, strong woman — a trial attorney, as a matter of fact.

  • Ann

    Could someone tell me if Ebert’s new version of At the Movies with that female and that guy with the long name is still on the air? It was on PBS, but now I can’t find it anymore…or is it just that my local PBS station isn’t airing them anymore?

    • pie thrower

      Ann,

      It is still on however, Ebert wrote on his website that during the summer PBS is limited in funds so in lieu of new episodes they have been reruning special topic episodes of “Sneak Previews” with Siskel and Ebert from the 1970′s and 1980′s. Pretty informative. If you are not seeing them, then it could be that your local PBS station has chosen not to run it until new episodes come back, which according Ebert is expected to happen in mid-October.

      • Ann

        Thank you! That explains a lot…although, that pretty much stinks, since so many films are released in the summertime.

  • Carla Greenwood

    Good. About time you took a good look at yourself Ebert. Give yourself a five-star rating!!

  • Canadian

    Hmmmm, Ebert could criticize the grammar of this article: “He began to interact frequent with his readers”….this is like Steven telling people, “you sing beautiful.”

    • Jennifer

      The article has several pretty obvious errors. But I do love Roger.

  • Jeannie

    I should really pick up a copy of his book. He really influenced my love of movies as a child, I remember watching Siskel and Ebert with my mom every week when I was young and he’s one of the reasons I fell in love with the movies in the first place!

  • viviennewestwood

    You¡­are¡­amazing! This weblog is so great. I really hope a lot more people read this and get what you are saying, ¡¯cause let me tell you, it¡¯s critical stuff. I never would have thought about it this way unless I would run into your web site. Thanks for sharing it. I hope you¡¯ve excellent achievement.

  • viviennewestwood

    Thanks for interesting blog post. You guys are always provide information that it makes it impossible not to want to buy your next product ;I can¡¯t wait to see what you guys come up with based on all your research and data that you gather.

  • louisvuittonbags

    Thanks for interesting blog post. You guys are always provide information that it makes it impossible not to want to buy your next product ;I can¡¯t wait to see what you guys come up with based on all your research and data that you gather.

Page:
Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP